Chinedum Treasure
ELDER statesman, Dr. Chike Obidigbo has described the recently unveiled memoir of former military President Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida as authoritative exposition of the cogs in Nigeria’s wheel of progress.
Obidigbo asserted that ‘A Journey in Service’ by IBB puts in black and white the foundation of political banditry and official graft that continue to threaten national unity and progress, as well as the chequered socio-economic marginalization of the Igbo ethnic nationality in the Nigeria project.
He expressed the belief that God kept IBB alive to bring closure to the very nagging lies and prejudices that kept eating at the very fabric of Nigeria’s unsteady march to the future, including elite conspiracy against the peace-loving poor masses of this country.
He noted that apart from the release of the concrete polling figures of the watershed 1993 presidential election, the major take away from the controversial memoir is IBB’s clarification on the 1966 coup.
“Some of us have always known that the naming of the January 1966 bloody putsch as Igbo coup was the deliberate orchaestration of the United Kingdom Government using the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC) and Lagos/Ibadan axis of domestic media.
“Britain resolved to sow the seed of long term political animosity between Igbo and Yoruba, as well as set Igbo up for national vilification, demonization and hatred. And, to my mind, this long range plot by the British, started with the ignition of open battle between ChiefsObafemi Awolowo and Samuel Ladoke Akintola, which snowballed into the 1966 coup.
“From branding the coup as Igbo, through the counter coup, the genocide, the breakdown of Aburi accord, and deceiving Ojukwu into secession by the same British provided a golden opportunity to destroy Ndigbo, Igbo land and the Eastern Nigeria emergent and thriving economy,” he remarked.
Obidigbo maintained that with the benefit of hindsight, nobody or group would explain in whose interest that the war was fought, regretting that Yoruba, Igbo, Ijaw, Biron, Jukun, Hausa or even Itsekiri can point to any benefit from the war.
He argued that even the current clamour for separation could as well be a part of the intended long term outcome of the war, stressing: “The civil war happened as the outcome anticipated by Britain, because it provided cover for the massive slaughter of nearly five million innocent Igbo civilians, including women and children in addition to automatically halting the status of Eastern Nigeria as the fastest growing economy South of Sahara.
“In A Journey Through Service, the former military president was right to specifically blame the declaration of Republic of Biafra as circumstantially enforced necessity for self preservation.
“Although Babangida tried to exonerate himself from the blameable annulment of a free and fair presidential election in 1993, Igbo are happy to hear from another top national player that Biafra arose out of the obvious failure by the General Yakubu Gowon-led Federal Military Government to stop the massive pogrom against Igbo people particularly in northern parts of the country.
“Why IBB stopped short of blaming Gowon also for reneging on the Aburi Accord, which he signed on behalf of Nigeria at the behest of the British leaves much to the imagination.
“All the same, it was that about face over Aburi that left Ojukwu with no other clear-cut option to stop the blood letting that followed. But for IBB’s account in his memoir, General Gowon would not have came out to boldly declare that Britain prevailed on him to wage a genocidal war against Igbo.
“A former British Prime Minister, Edward (Ted) Heath, did not hide British antipathy towards Igbo when he boldly declared that whoever dares to touch or constitute a threat to British economic interest, Britain must touch his heart. Britain sees the Economy as a form of religion.
About Author
