• About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Saturday, January 24, 2026
Anambra people magazine
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GENERAL
  • CRIME
  • ANAMBRA TV
  • EDUCATION
  • BUSINESS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • EVENTS
  • ANAMBRA @30
  • DIASPORA
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GENERAL
  • CRIME
  • ANAMBRA TV
  • EDUCATION
  • BUSINESS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • EVENTS
  • ANAMBRA @30
  • DIASPORA
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
Anambra people magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home BUSINESS / ENTREPRENEURSHIP

$2 Billion Debt Dispute: Court Sacks Nestoil’s Lawyers.  

Onyeka by Onyeka
January 24, 2026
in BUSINESS / ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Court grants Ukatu bail, fixes October 6 for hearing
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

Nestoil Limited, Neconde Energy Limited, and their principal owners, Ernest Azudialu-Obiejesi and his wife, suffered a legal setback on Friday as the Court of Appeal disqualified their lawyers in an ongoing multibillion-dollar debt recovery case.

 

 

 

The appellate court barred Senior Advocates of Nigeria Wole Olanipekun and Muiz Banire, along with their legal teams, from representing Neconde and Nestoil. The court held that the companies’ board, led by Azudialu-Obiejesi, no longer had the authority to appoint counsel following the appointment of a Receiver/Manager over the firms.

RelatedPosts

Billionaire Arthur Eze Clarifies Why His Company Suspended Further Investments in Senegal Despite Sinking $45Million.

Audrey Ezeigbo Takes Over as New Falcon Boss, Sets Agenda For Growth

Jubliation in Anambra as Nwoke Udi Palmwine Bar Marks 10 Years in Business 

 

The ruling also struck out all court filings submitted by the disqualified lawyers and ordered them to cease involvement in the case.

 

 

 

The dispute centers on debt obligations exceeding US$2 billion owed by Nestoil and its affiliates to a consortium of lenders, including FBNQuest Merchant Bank and First Trustees.

 

 

 

The decision follows a Supreme Court directive last week, which instructed all parties to return to the Court of Appeal to clarify the legitimacy of legal representation as a preliminary matter. The apex court emphasized that procedural tactics should not be used to delay repayment of legitimate debts.

 

 

 

With the Appeal Court ruling, the question of legal representation identified by the Supreme Court has been resolved, reinforcing the position of lenders in the debt recovery process. Observers say the judgment signals increased judicial scrutiny over attempts by distressed companies to frustrate receivership through procedural maneuvers.

 

 

 

Nestoil and Neconde are now expected to formalize their representation in accordance with the receivership framework as the case continues.

About Author

Onyeka

See author's posts

    Previous Post

    Why Ken Emeakayi Deserves Appreciation, Not Rumour

    Onyeka

    Onyeka

    Recent News

    Court grants Ukatu bail, fixes October 6 for hearing

    $2 Billion Debt Dispute: Court Sacks Nestoil’s Lawyers.  

    January 24, 2026
    Why Ken Emeakayi Deserves Appreciation, Not Rumour

    Why Ken Emeakayi Deserves Appreciation, Not Rumour

    January 24, 2026
    Court grants Ukatu bail, fixes October 6 for hearing

    Twist in Murder Case as Two Sureties Serve Withdrawal Notice in Awka High Court

    January 23, 2026
    APGA: Edozie Njoku Arraigned Over Alleged Forgery Of Supreme Court Judgement

    Former Anambra House of Reps Member dumps APGA

    January 23, 2026

    Most Read

    No Content Available

    Copyright © ANAMBRA PEOPLE MAGAZINE. All rights reserved.

    No Result
    View All Result
    • Home
    • POLITICS
    • GENERAL
    • CRIME
    • ANAMBRA TV
    • EDUCATION
    • BUSINESS
    • ENTERTAINMENT
    • EVENTS
    • ANAMBRA @30
    • DIASPORA
    • Sports

    © wordpress-1211428-4405999.cloudwaysapps.com