• About
  • Advertise
  • Privacy & Policy
  • Contact
Tuesday, June 30, 2026
Anambra people magazine
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GENERAL
  • CRIME
  • ANAMBRA TV
  • EDUCATION
  • BUSINESS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • EVENTS
  • ANAMBRA @30
  • DIASPORA
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GENERAL
  • CRIME
  • ANAMBRA TV
  • EDUCATION
  • BUSINESS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • EVENTS
  • ANAMBRA @30
  • DIASPORA
  • Sports
No Result
View All Result
Anambra people magazine
No Result
View All Result
Home BUSINESS / ENTREPRENEURSHIP

$2 Billion Debt Dispute: Court Sacks Nestoil’s Lawyers.  

Onyeka by Onyeka
January 24, 2026
in BUSINESS / ENTREPRENEURSHIP
Court grants Ukatu bail, fixes October 6 for hearing
Share on FacebookShare on TwitterShare on Whatsapp

Nestoil Limited, Neconde Energy Limited, and their principal owners, Ernest Azudialu-Obiejesi and his wife, suffered a legal setback on Friday as the Court of Appeal disqualified their lawyers in an ongoing multibillion-dollar debt recovery case.

 

 

 

The appellate court barred Senior Advocates of Nigeria Wole Olanipekun and Muiz Banire, along with their legal teams, from representing Neconde and Nestoil. The court held that the companies’ board, led by Azudialu-Obiejesi, no longer had the authority to appoint counsel following the appointment of a Receiver/Manager over the firms.

RelatedPosts

Nestoil Wins Again as First Bank Suffers Setback on Case Reassignment, $1.8bn Damages Suit Gains Momentum

Why Access to Structured Merchant Financing Matters for SME Growth

Build Wealth With Attention Capital, VFD Boss, Okpala To Young Nigerians

 

The ruling also struck out all court filings submitted by the disqualified lawyers and ordered them to cease involvement in the case.

 

 

 

The dispute centers on debt obligations exceeding US$2 billion owed by Nestoil and its affiliates to a consortium of lenders, including FBNQuest Merchant Bank and First Trustees.

 

 

 

The decision follows a Supreme Court directive last week, which instructed all parties to return to the Court of Appeal to clarify the legitimacy of legal representation as a preliminary matter. The apex court emphasized that procedural tactics should not be used to delay repayment of legitimate debts.

 

 

 

With the Appeal Court ruling, the question of legal representation identified by the Supreme Court has been resolved, reinforcing the position of lenders in the debt recovery process. Observers say the judgment signals increased judicial scrutiny over attempts by distressed companies to frustrate receivership through procedural maneuvers.

 

 

 

Nestoil and Neconde are now expected to formalize their representation in accordance with the receivership framework as the case continues.

About Author

Onyeka

See author's posts

Previous Post

Why Ken Emeakayi Deserves Appreciation, Not Rumour

Next Post

Anambra Community Boils Over Govt-Released Compensatory Plots.

Onyeka

Onyeka

Next Post
How Floods killed two children in Anambra

Anambra Community Boils Over Govt-Released Compensatory Plots.

Recent News

‎2027: PDP, APC, NDC members endorse APGA candidate In Anambra

‎2027: PDP, APC, NDC members endorse APGA candidate In Anambra

June 30, 2026
President Mothers Union, Dr. Martha Chioma Ibezim Begs President Tinubu, Governor Soludo On Insecurity

President Mothers Union, Dr. Martha Chioma Ibezim Begs President Tinubu, Governor Soludo On Insecurity

June 30, 2026
Three Attributes That Make Anambra An Important State In Nigeria

Anambra approves N200bn investment fund

June 30, 2026
Three Attributes That Make Anambra An Important State In Nigeria

Sanitation exercise: No movement in Anambra till 11am on July 4th

June 30, 2026

Most Read

No Content Available

Copyright © ANAMBRA PEOPLE MAGAZINE. All rights reserved.

No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • POLITICS
  • GENERAL
  • CRIME
  • ANAMBRA TV
  • EDUCATION
  • BUSINESS
  • ENTERTAINMENT
  • EVENTS
  • ANAMBRA @30
  • DIASPORA
  • Sports

© wordpress-1211428-4405999.cloudwaysapps.com