There is a reason unscheduled visits unsettle systems: they expose truth without warning, without rehearsal, and without the comfort of excuses. That was what Prof. Charles Chukwuma Soludo brought to the Awka Government Secretariat: not spectacle, but a mirror.
And predictably, the noise that has followed is not outrage; it is discomfort. The kind that arises when a long-tolerated culture of laxity is suddenly confronted with consequences.
Let us be clear. Public service is not a favor done to the people, it is a duty owed them, fully paid for in advance. Every salary earned by a civil servant is drawn from the relentless enterprise of the ordinary citizen: the trader who opens before dawn, the farmer who labors through uncertainty, the artisan who earns by the day. To then reduce resumption time to a suggestion, or attendance to a matter of convenience, is not inefficiency; it is a quiet but deliberate abuse of trust.
What the Governor’s visit revealed is not an isolated lapse. It is a pattern: one that has been normalized over time by weak enforcement and a dangerous tolerance for mediocrity. A system where lateness is explained away, absenteeism is rationalized, and accountability is treated as optional will, inevitably, produce exactly what we saw.
Now, to those already reaching for the familiar refuge of “harshness” and “overreaction,” the question is simple: at what point did discipline become oppression? When did enforcing basic responsibility turn into an offense?
Because let us not pretend, no serious institution, public or private, survives on goodwill alone. It survives on standards. And standards mean nothing if they are neither monitored nor enforced.
The suspensions, therefore, are not excessive. They are corrective. A necessary signal that the era of casual public service must give way to one defined by responsibility and measurable commitment. You cannot demand the benefits of public office while negotiating its obligations.
There is also a deeper implication that must not be ignored. Institutions do not collapse overnight; they erode gradually, through tolerated indiscipline, excused inefficiency, and leadership that looks away. Reversing that erosion requires more than circulars and talks. It requires moments like this; clear, visible, and decisive.
This is where leadership earns its meaning. Not in speeches, but in the willingness to confront dysfunction at its root, even when it unsettles the comfortable.
At its core, this is not about lateness. It is about restoring a culture where duty is taken seriously, where time is respected, and where public office is understood for what it is; a trust, not an entitlement.
And if that standard feels too demanding, then perhaps the question is not about the Governor’s action, but about who truly belongs in public service at all.
About Author
